FROM THE EDITOR — About WA’s Long Jump Proposal

THE TASK OF BLOWING hot air into this column space is easier when a topic serves itself up. It happens that as I reach for one this time, the WIC in Glasgow has just played out simultaneously with the hubbub around World Athletics’ plan to test out replacement of the long jump board’s foul line with a hard-to-miss launch zone and measurement from the point of takeoff to landing spot.

The concept is technically feasible at the elite level. WA hopes the elimination of anticlimactic fouls with the TV cameras rolling will at once heighten spectator interest and tighten up both presentation and the duration of competitions.

Long jump greats Carl Lewis, Tianna Madison, Dwight Phillips, Miltiádis Tentóglou and Ivana Španović all hate the idea. Replace their beloved baby with a new offspring that’s only kinda, sorta the same — can’t blame them.

“I have to plead guilty to being torn on whether I think it’s a good thing or bad,” Editor Emeritus Garry Hill confessed when the proposal leaped into our staff e-mail exchanges.

Same here, me too, me three, I mused, conflicting convictions shouting at each other across my cortex. History and tradition — obvious considerations. Flipside of the coin, recognition that this enchanting sport so often loses its way into dead pools of monotony where any hope for a hook on uninitiated sports fans floats off into the gloom.

So count me in the yes column. WA absolutely should try its LJ experiment. Last season Major League Baseball, another sport — which though hugely more popular on TV and in stadiums than track & field in this country — recognized the trend toward preference for faster pacing, more constant action.

If you follow the diamond sport at all, you know the actions taken: pitch clock, larger bases conducive to swift, dramatic steals, position-shift restrictions to increase batting average.

The changes mostly worked. Attendance climbed, average length of a 9-inning game dropped about 15%. Home runs, strikeouts and base steals all went up — more action in less time.

Memories viz meet presentation bubbled up through an e-mail thread I’m on with fellow track alums of my Div. III alma mater as the chatter turned to indoor track. Unusual since our old school, Pomona College (Pomona-Pitzer for sports purposes) is on the West Coast. But Pomona, as I write has three current runners readying for indoor nationals and a few older alums on the thread had raced indoors at Southern California invitationals in the ’70s.

Soon a few of us were tapping keyboards or phones all atwitter about those under-a-roof carnivals, most organized by showman promoter Al Franken with sponsor names in their names: Sunkist, Michelob, the LA Times meet, the Muhammad Ali Invitational (not all Franken productions). There was an entertainment buzz around those meets.

As one alum wrote, “That Sunkist was indeed a show. I can’t believe Al Franken put it together. I was a bit overwhelmed by the hustle and bustle of the whole thing. All I remember is that I ran a race but my memory is really overshadowed by the spectacle.”

Heck, in the early ’60s, before my time, T&FN co-founder Bert Nelson directed the indoor Golden Gate Invitational at San Francisco’s Cow Palace. Online someone on our thread found a meet program from the ’66 edition. The 2½-hour event slate shouted, “Let’s entertain ‘em!” Devil-Take-The-Hindmost Mile, Weight Man’s 60, a “World Record” in the 160-yard dash (once around the board track).

There were 9300 fans in the building who, per T&FN’s meet report, “weathered a major flu epidemic and a heavy rainstorm.”

Loopy as some events were, it sounds like great fun, and the GGI was also a quality meet. There’s room for both in this sport. Aussie Ron Clarke cut 2 seconds from the WR for 2M with 20-year-old American Tracy Smith 3.6 back in the then No. 4 all-time indoor clocking. A 4:00.3 Jim Grelle mile, damn fast for the day. Five world class jumps & throws comps.

I believe modern track, too, can tag team invention, quality and tradition. Give it a go, WA. If this long jump wheeze lands face first, at least you tried.

Subscription Options

Digital Only Subscription

  • Access to Current Articles
  • Access to Current Issues
  • eTrack Results Newsletter
  • Unlimited Content from our Technique Journal, Track Coach

$88 per year (recurring)

Digital Only Premium Archive

  • Unlimited Articles
  • Access to Archived Issues
  • eTrack Results Newsletter
  • Unlimited Content from our Technique Journal, Track Coach

$138 per year (recurring)

Print + Digital Subscription

  • Access to Current Articles
  • Access to Current Issues
  • eTrack Results Newsletter
  • Unlimited Content from our Technique Journal, Track Coach
  • 12 Monthly Print Issues

$125.00 USA per year (recurring)
$173.00 Canada per year (recurring)
$223.00 Foreign per year (recurring)

Print + Digital Premium Archive

  • Unlimited Articles
  • Access to Archived Issues
  • eTrack Results Newsletter
  • Unlimited Content from our Technique Journal, Track Coach
  • 12 Monthly Print Issues

$175.00 USA per year (recurring)
$223.00 Canada per year (recurring)
$273.00 Foreign per year (recurring)

Print Only Subscription

  • 12 Monthly Print Issues
  • Does not include online access or eTrack Results Newsletter

$89.00 USA per year (recurring)
$137.00 Canada per year (recurring)
$187.00 Foreign per year (recurring)

Track Coach
(Digital Only)

  • Track Coach Quarterly Technique Journal
  • Access to Track Coach Archived Issues

Note: Track Coach is included with all Track & Field News digital subscriptions. If you are a current T&FN subscriber, purchase of a Track Coach subscription will terminate your existing T&FN subscription and change your access level to Track Coach content only. Track & Field News print only subscribers will need to upgrade to a T&FN subscription level that includes digital access to read Track Coach issues and articles online.

$19.95 every 1 year (recurring)

*Every 30 days