Apologies if this is premature and not allowed, no bad intentions here, just wanted to bring up news. I also don't see this on the front page yet either, but Coleman seems to have missed 3 drug tests in the past 12 months. Could be in a bit of trouble?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sp...ugs-tests.html
Results 1 to 10 of 246
-
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Posts
- 8,745
08-22-2019 12:48 PMLast edited by gh; 09-02-2019 at 06:31 PM.
-
- Join Date
- Jun 2016
- Posts
- 1,842
08-22-2019 01:56 PMOnline scuttlebutt is that someone's getting spanked hard real soon.
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 20,260
08-22-2019 01:56 PMSo far, this has shown up on the web only on the Daily Mail site and a couple of others that simply cite the Daily Mail article. It's been out there for a few hours and I would imagine the wire services and the major dailies, here and in the UK, would be all over it trying to verify it and go with it. Hasn't happened yet. Stay tuned.
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Woodland Park, CO
- Posts
- 7,674
08-22-2019 02:04 PMI think if I was a world class athlete subject to random testing, I would just have a locator chip implanted under my skin, so they could find me anytime, Orwell be damned.
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- right where I'm supposed to be.
- Posts
- 629
08-22-2019 02:33 PMUnless of course you don’t want to be found. However third time around, I’d also be damn sure they knew where I was.
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 20,260
08-22-2019 02:46 PMThe Daily Mail story is now linked in the front page headline section here. The Telegraph, a mainstream UK paper, now has the story, but it just cites the Daily Mail story and has no new info.
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- North Texas
- Posts
- 3,405
-
- Join Date
- Jun 2019
- Posts
- 27
08-22-2019 03:07 PMHoping we don’t have to see the Dope Talk forum opened up again...
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 20,260
08-22-2019 03:17 PMThey may be the same sources, but it's very significant that the AP has spoken to them and deemed them reliable enough to run the story. Now it's not just the Daily Mail, about which Wiki sez:
>>In February 2017, the English Wikipedia banned the Daily Mail as an "unreliable source" to use as a reference in Wikipedia. Its use as a reference is now "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist". . . Support for the ban centred on "the Daily Mail's reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication"<<
-
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Posts
- 637
08-22-2019 03:30 PMWhereabout failures can cover a range of administrative errors, not limited to missed drug tests.
https://www.usada.org/what-are-whereabouts-failures/