Facts, Not Fiction

 
Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 89
  1. Collapse Details
     
    #61
    Quote Originally Posted by Trickstat View Post
    No they are leading exponents at the heptathlon who don't want to have that replaced by a decathlon that features events that they may not have ever even attempted before.

    I do think the right approach is for an announcement to be made at some stage that the decathlon will replace the heptathlon at a particular Worlds and subsequent Olympics some 6 to 10 years from the announcement.
    I do think that the heptathlon should be replaced by the decathlon, preferably by the 2028 Olympics. If you are right about the timing the governing bodies, especially the IAAF, should make the decision sooner, like in 2020, or else the decision will be pushed back farther and farther, making the transition more difficult if not impossible.

    As for the heptathletes not wanting to do more events I say they are not owed multi-events with events that they prefer to do. Multi-event men do have to pole vault, for instance, or not be eligible to do combined events at championship level. If anything the heptathletes should welcome the chance to do more events and longer races since it would be a new challenge for them.
    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
     
    #62
    Quote Originally Posted by ralmcg View Post
    I do think that the heptathlon should be replaced by the decathlon, preferably by the 2028 Olympics. If you are right about the timing the governing bodies, especially the IAAF, should make the decision sooner, like in 2020, or else the decision will be pushed back farther and farther, making the transition more difficult if not impossible.

    As for the heptathletes not wanting to do more events I say they are not owed multi-events with events that they prefer to do. Multi-event men do have to pole vault, for instance, or not be eligible to do combined events at championship level. If anything the heptathletes should welcome the chance to do more events and longer races since it would be a new challenge for them.
    Who's to decide what multi-events will be available? Forum potatoes? Are there polls that show that people will preferably watch Dec over Hep? Or is it to be dictated by some random people? And if so, why complaining about the current situation?

    By the way, 20-athlon is even more challenging and also exists, although not officially. 😉
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
     
    #63
    Quote Originally Posted by nico21 View Post
    Who's to decide what multi-events will be available? Forum potatoes? Are there polls that show that people will preferably watch Dec over Hep? Or is it to be dictated by some random people? And if so, why complaining about the current situation?

    By the way, 20-athlon is even more challenging and also exists, although not officially. ��
    In regards to why I am complaining about the current situation is (1) the multi-events aren't equal for men and women on the face of it (7 events for women, with shorter races, 10 events for men) and (2) my selfish reason, which is I like to see women multi-eventers pole vault.

    Here's a question for you, nico21. Would you, in the interest of equality, have the men compete in the heptathlon only, no decathlon?
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
     
    #64
    I would much rather see the men go to the heptathlon, same events as the women currently do.
    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
     
    #65
    Quote Originally Posted by ralmcg View Post
    Multi-event men do have to pole vault, for instance, or not be eligible to do combined events at championship level.
    Yes, and that's one reason why many don't train for the decathlon, and choose other events or other sports altogether.

    But men around the world have have greater access to the pole vault than women, and much greater access to other sporting opportunities both at the amateur and professional level, so the pole vault's inclusion in the men's decathlon doesn't harm men nearly as much as it would harm women.
    If anything the heptathletes should welcome the chance to do more events and longer races since it would be a new challenge for them.
    Why should they welcome something that is so difficult to access? Female multi-eventers get paid less than men, and you want to dig into their pockets even more by adding the most expensive event to their lineup?

    Did you know that in Jamaica, there is still no pole vault for girls in high school? Jamaica doesn't even have the pole vault listed in their women's U20 records. And the women's adult record is only 3.40m, set over 20 years ago by a woman living in the UK.

    Before the decathlon is going to replace the women's heptathlon, there needs to be serious progress around the world with access to the pole vault for girls and young women. Or make the women's decathlon include something else instead of the pole vault, like the 400m hurdles or steeplechase.
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
     
    #66
    Quote Originally Posted by ralmcg View Post
    In regards to why I am complaining about the current situation is (1) the multi-events aren't equal for men and women on the face of it (7 events for women, with shorter races, 10 events for men) and (2) my selfish reason, which is I like to see women multi-eventers pole vault.

    Here's a question for you, nico21. Would you, in the interest of equality, have the men compete in the heptathlon only, no decathlon?
    I just don't have the same view on "equality". It's never something forced upon the ones who "benefits" and it doesn't have anything to do with symbolics (eg. 2-sets vs 3-sets), especially if it is enforced by people that are not directly concerned.

    If you ask me what I'd done at the time of the introduction of both events, I surely would have proposed the same for men and women.
    But what is done is done and heptathlon has gone its own way.
    Additionally, I don't see any inherent superiority to having 10 events instead of 7, except for the number itself, but even that is overrated.
    If you really want more versatility, just include a 10000m or a half-marathon instead of a third jump/throw/sprint event. It will be shorter and easier to follow on tv than a decathlon pole-vault competition during major champs, when multi-event coverage gets crippled.

    P.S.: that marathon thing was ironic 🙂
    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
     
    #67
    Quote Originally Posted by 18.99s View Post
    Yes, and that's one reason why many don't train for the decathlon, and choose other events or other sports altogether.

    But men around the world have have greater access to the pole vault than women, and much greater access to other sporting opportunities both at the amateur and professional level, so the pole vault's inclusion in the men's decathlon doesn't harm men nearly as much as it would harm women.

    Why should they welcome something that is so difficult to access? Female multi-eventers get paid less than men, and you want to dig into their pockets even more by adding the most expensive event to their lineup?

    Did you know that in Jamaica, there is still no pole vault for girls in high school? Jamaica doesn't even have the pole vault listed in their women's U20 records. And the women's adult record is only 3.40m, set over 20 years ago by a woman living in the UK.

    Before the decathlon is going to replace the women's heptathlon, there needs to be serious progress around the world with access to the pole vault for girls and young women. Or make the women's decathlon include something else instead of the pole vault, like the 400m hurdles or steeplechase.
    I do agree with you in that there should be more access to the pole vault for women and girls, and also for men and boys that don't have access to the pole vault.

    I want to ask whose fault is it that women have less access to the pole vault than men, especially in places like Jamaica? My guess it would be men who don't want to share their pole vault equipment with women. The pole vault not being more available for women could be solved, in part, if there was more will on the part of athletic associations, clubs, etc.
    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
     
    #68
    Quote Originally Posted by nico21 View Post
    I just don't have the same view on "equality". It's never something forced upon the ones who "benefits" and it doesn't have anything to do with symbolics (eg. 2-sets vs 3-sets), especially if it is enforced by people that are not directly concerned.

    If you ask me what I'd done at the time of the introduction of both events, I surely would have proposed the same for men and women.
    But what is done is done and heptathlon has gone its own way.
    Additionally, I don't see any inherent superiority to having 10 events instead of 7, except for the number itself, but even that is overrated.
    If you really want more versatility, just include a 10000m or a half-marathon instead of a third jump/throw/sprint event. It will be shorter and easier to follow on tv than a decathlon pole-vault competition during major champs, when multi-event coverage gets crippled.

    P.S.: that marathon thing was ironic ��
    So in other words since women did not have decathlon in the past, they are stuck with the heptathlon as their "gender appropriate "multi-event. You do know that there are some women who do compete in the decathlon. Would you deny them the opportunity to do it at a major championships?
    Reply With Quote
     

  9. Collapse Details
     
    #69
    I will say that most, if not all, of the respondents of this thread would like to see women's decathlon be contested as much as possible. Some, like 18.99s, would like to see progress in access to women's pole vault, for instance, before the women's decathlon can be considered for major championships and the Olympics. I can understand that, but I would like to see this tackled sooner rather than later so that the women's decathlon can be contested sooner rather than later.
    Reply With Quote
     

  10. Collapse Details
     
    #70
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    23,437
    Quote Originally Posted by ralmcg View Post
    I want to ask whose fault is it that women have less access to the pole vault than men, especially in places like Jamaica? My guess it would be men who don't want to share their pole vault equipment with women. The pole vault not being more available for women could be solved, in part, if there was more will on the part of athletic associations, clubs, etc.
    What equipment would they have to share? The vault pit sits empty most of the time so that should not be a problem with sharing. They would not be using the same poles; is it the shortage of chalk?
    Reply With Quote
     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •