It is nothing to celebrate, but I don't see it as a situation with no room on the bus for them. They are free to compete with the men in any event. The particular individuals currently affected might not have the potential to be competitive with elite men, but that is also true of the vast majority of athletically above average men who were unable to reach the elite ranks, which includes most of us on this message board.
The reasons we have not seen any 46XY DSD athletes posting male-level elite times are rarity, privacy, and gender identity, not a biological ceiling on the capabilities of 46XY DSD athletes.
1. Rarity
Estimates of the prevalence of 46 XY DSD indicate there are less than 1 million people with it in the world. For argument's sake, let's say a full 1 million, of whom 500,000 are in the age range for elite sports. But they are randomly scattered around the world, not concentrated in a track-savvy country like Jamaica or Kenya. If you randomly picked 500,000 men around the world from age 18-40, you probably won't pick even one who is in the top 50 for any event in track & field. Such men are rarer than 1 in a million globally.
But if the world had a billion people with 46XY DSD, some of them would be posting times in the elite range for males.
2. Privacy
Some don't want people to know about their condition, and competition in high level sports could expose them, so they stay out of such competition to maintain their privacy. Others may be dominating another women's sport that doesn't have DSD regulations, and they've managed to keep their condition private, or they personally don't even know they have the condition.
3. Gender Identity.
Some with 46XY DSD choose to live as male, even having surgery to descend the internals if that is physically possible and medically available to them, so they don't compete in women's sports. There could be a sub-4 miler or 10.1 sprinter out there who was born with 46XY DSD but they wouldn't raise eyebrows because they're competing in men's races.
Results 641 to 650 of 663
-
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Posts
- 2,616
09-25-2019 10:13 AMLast edited by 18.99s; 09-25-2019 at 10:22 AM.
-
- Join Date
- Jun 2016
- Posts
- 1,840
-
-
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Posts
- 2,616
-
- Join Date
- Jul 2019
- Posts
- 237
-
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Woodland Park, CO
- Posts
- 7,663
-
- Join Date
- Jun 2016
- Posts
- 1,840
-
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Posts
- 2,616
09-25-2019 11:01 PM1:54 isn't easy. In some states that's good enough to get on the podium at the high school state championships in the boys' 800m. Only a few thousand men in the world can run 1:54 or faster.
With a global population base of 46XY DSD in the hundreds of thousands, scattered around the globe rather than concentrated in a track-savvy country, with maybe half or more self-removing from women's sports for the reasons I mentioned in that earlier long post, 1:54 seems like a good statistical expectation for the best of such a limited and scattered population size, if they have exactly the same distribution of athletic potential as unambiguous males globally.Last edited by 18.99s; 09-25-2019 at 11:14 PM.
-
-
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Abilene, TX
- Posts
- 2,150