### Facts, Not Fiction

1.
Ok, why did they choose 91.44cm for these hurdles and not say 91.00, 92.00 or 91.45 even. WTH?

2.
Originally Posted by proofs in the pudd'in
Ok, why did they choose 91.44cm for these hurdles and not say 91.00, 92.00 or 91.45 even. WTH?
91.44cm = 36 inches

3.
Originally Posted by reggaeirie1234
91.44cm = 36 inches
Yep, all part of the rich tapestry of history.

It depends if events were developed or dominated in/by Imperial or metric countries:

1. hurdles heights obviously formalised in nice round imperial feet and inches (not inches as USAnians are wont to do) -
• Full strength = 3 1/2 feet = 42 inches = 106.68 cm.
• Make it a bit lower for the juniors = 3 1/4 feet = 39 inches = 99.06 cm,
• Make it a bit lower again for U18s = 3 feet = 36 inches = 91.44 cm.

2. what about 110m? Well, that's the same but a neater conversion, 120 yards = 109.728m. Let's just call that 110 shall we?

3. Why is a shot 7.26 kilograms - that's because it's 16 pounds

4. Why is the discus 4.4 lbs - because its exactly 2 kilograms, just like the continentals liked it.

4.
Originally Posted by El Toro
Yep, all part of the rich tapestry of history.

It depends if events were developed or dominated in/by Imperial or metric countries:

1. hurdles heights obviously formalised in nice round imperial feet and inches (not inches as USAnians are wont to do) -
• Full strength = 3 1/2 feet = 42 inches = 106.68 cm.
• Make it a bit lower for the juniors = 3 1/4 feet = 39 inches = 99.06 cm,
• Make it a bit lower again for U18s = 3 feet = 36 inches = 91.44 cm.

2. what about 110m? Well, that's the same but a neater conversion, 120 yards = 109.728m. Let's just call that 110 shall we?

3. Why is a shot 7.26 kilograms - that's because it's 16 pounds

4. Why is the discus 4.4 lbs - because its exactly 2 kilograms, just like the continentals liked it.
El Toro - Thanks for that - I just didn't think the metric guys who decided (whoever that is) gave a crap about keeping the imperial measurement as an equal length/height/etc. just like you mentioned with the 110mH. They just rounded. Same with the mile - 1609.xxm yet they just say 1600m or not will just go with 1500m Huh! I just don't get why they did not just go 90 or 91 or 92 or 91.50 - anything but this crap 91.44 jeez! I mean if you are going to change it and jettison the inches/feet crap then just round that shit. I want to know the names of these fools who decided this nonsense - JK but I would love to know the decision makers on this and how they decided not to round. That would be an interesting history to our sport.

5.
the "fools" who decided on 91.44 saved those who owned the hundreds of thousands of existing hurdles from having to purchase new ones. Made perfect sense.

6.
Originally Posted by gh
the "fools" who decided on 91.44 saved those who owned the hundreds of thousands of existing hurdles from having to purchase new ones. Made perfect sense.
Still fools - who made fixed hurdles? Ha, rather than adjustable for all the heights used. Oy vey! And I doubt that any of the hurdles in existence when this was decided are still being used. But maybe I'm wrong.

7.
you're wrong

8.
Originally Posted by gh
you're wrong
Yeah, that's ok I'm still learning but still like you!

9.
This thread seems a good place for a bit of hurdle height controversy...

Anyway Sasha won the final of his 200m in a windy 20.81 (3.1).

Originally Posted by Powell
Grant Szalek, who has double citizenship, has now opted to compete for Poland at the European U23 Champs.
I see he is still competing for AUS in the Universiade tonight.

10.
Grant Szalek is listed to start in Universiade HJ today competing for Australia. Does this preclude his switch to Poland also?

Page 25 of 41 First ... 15232425262735 ... Last

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•