Facts, Not Fiction

 
Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910
Results 91 to 99 of 99
  1. Collapse Details
     
    #91
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Woodland Hills, CA
    Posts
    3,108
    No discussion of the men's 200m final, I see... Well, let me just ask: when was the last time the US Championships was won in a time slower than 20.45???
    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
     
    #92
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Mired in Tar
    Posts
    2,076
    When was the last time it was held in fairly short order after a three-hour weather delay?
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
     
    #93
    Quote Originally Posted by JRM View Post
    No discussion of the men's 200m final, I see... Well, let me just ask: when was the last time the US Championships was won in a time slower than 20.45???
    2001 - 20.54 Shawn Crawford (wind -0.9)

    Webb's race was into a 1.9 wind. How does that work in your calculator?
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
     
    #94
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    west of Westeros
    Posts
    60,964
    Quote Originally Posted by Davidokun View Post
    When was the last time it was held in fairly short order after a three-hour weather delay?
    a delay that actually gave them the advantage of a far longer break between semi and final than normal, no?
    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
     
    #95
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Woodland Hills, CA
    Posts
    3,108
    Quote Originally Posted by gm View Post
    2001 - 20.54 Shawn Crawford (wind -0.9)

    Webb's race was into a 1.9 wind. How does that work in your calculator?
    20.32, thanks for asking. When the Canadians are running faster, you have to wonder. So... my greater question still stands. What's happened to the men's 200m?
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
     
    #96
    The field ran much better in the semis earlier in the day, with Webb at 20.13. The long weather delay was not a help, I'm sure. Just one of those dud races. Not as bad as 20.77 for Ron Clark in 1994!
    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
     
    #97
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Mired in Tar
    Posts
    2,076
    Quote Originally Posted by gh View Post
    a delay that actually gave them the advantage of a far longer break between semi and final than normal, no?
    If it were scheduled that way, then yes. But they were about half and hour from racing the final, then had to wait for an indefinite period of time, which turned out to be about three hours, and then had about an hour to prepare for the final. Result: after adjusting for lane, wind, and altitude using JRM's calculator, the average difference between final and semifinal was -0.08 this year, versus +0.08 last year. That is, last year they ran faster in the final, with a short break (and in extreme heat); this year they ran slower in the final, with a long break.
    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
     
    #98
    Let's also bear in mind that Michael Norman scratched from the final. The race might have been faster if he had been in it.
    Reply With Quote
     

  9. Collapse Details
     
    #99
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Right next to a Gator filled pond
    Posts
    4,684
    Quote Originally Posted by JRM View Post
    20.32, thanks for asking. When the Canadians are running faster, you have to wonder. So... my greater question still stands. What's happened to the men's 200m?
    Lyles and Norman didn't run; Young didn't run; Coleman didn't run;

    Semis were faster.
    Reply With Quote
     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •