Facts, Not Fiction

 
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. Collapse Details
    Levels of doping suspicion
    #1
    The point I was trying to make before with Coe's erasing of world records is that I think we can group and rank athletes based on levels of doping suspicion and then determine where or if a line should be drawn. For example, T&F News does this already with Barnes and the Chinese women. I will attempt to do this (without mentioning any names other than Barnes - because this site already discounts his WR). I believe T&F News draws the line after #2. Feel free to discuss these and/or rank them yourself. If somehow this offends anyone at the home office, please delete and I will never mention PED's again.

    1) If an athlete gets busted in the same year of their WR, then it gets thrown out (Barnes)
    2) If a number of runners from a nation runs unbelievable times with suspicious circumstances and never approach those again (Chinese women)
    3) if a nation has a systematic doping program where every single athlete receives PEDs (East Germany??)
    4) If an athlete gets busted and then returns in a following year to set a WR (likely receiving benefits of PEDs)
    5) If a nation has a major problem where dozens of their top athletes are busted and/or their top leaders try to get doping covered up (currently Russia??)
    6) If an athlete is suspiciously muscular and/or has major improvements at a later age than normal for their event
    7) If an athlete gets busted the year after or several years after setting a WR
    8) If an athlete trains with or is coached by someone with PED ties
     

  2. Collapse Details
     
    #2
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    west of Westeros
    Posts
    61,618
    good bye!
     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •