Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32
  1. Collapse Details
    "The Wind Read Zero": An oral history of Flo Jo's 10.49
    #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Woodland Hills, CA
    Posts
    2,737
    Found this interesting article on Flo-Jo's "historic" run at the 1988 US Olympic Trials in Indianapolis. A slew of personalities give recollections of the race and the surrounding conditions. The actual video is included at the bottom; interesting to see again after all these years (and to hear the reactions of those calling the race):


    http://dailyrelay.com/the-wind-read-...-world-record/
    Reply With Quote
     

  2. Collapse Details
     
    #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Waitin' for Santa
    Posts
    964
    Quote Originally Posted by JRM View Post
    The actual video is included at the bottom;
    Look at the official's white flag being held up right behind the blocks. It looks like it is blowing stiffly directly perpendicular to the track. If I'm seeing it correctly, it would explain why everyone thought it was so windy, but her wind reading was 0.0.
    Reply With Quote
     

  3. Collapse Details
    #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Atticus View Post
    Look at the official's white flag being held up right behind the blocks. It looks like it is blowing stiffly directly perpendicular to the track. If I'm seeing it correctly, it would explain why everyone thought it was so windy, but her wind reading was 0.0.
    Thanks for the article. That's a great point. Enough proof for me that the wind really was 0.0

    Last edited by spammer; 08-26-2014 at 06:03 PM.
    Reply With Quote
     

  4. Collapse Details
     
    #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Woodland Hills, CA
    Posts
    2,737
    Quote Originally Posted by spammer View Post
    Thanks for the article. That's a great point. Enough proof for me that the wind really was 0.0
    But your conclusion goes against a large number of the eyewitness testimonies in the article.

    Also, I don't think the flag is blowing perpendicular to the track. It's the angle of the photo.
    Reply With Quote
     

  5. Collapse Details
     
    #5
    True, I could be wrong. But it looks perpendicular to me, blowing into the face of the crowd, and against the turn after the finish line. I added a second bigger picture. I admit I might be seeing it wrong though.
    Last edited by spammer; 08-26-2014 at 06:02 PM.
    Reply With Quote
     

  6. Collapse Details
     
    #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Abilene, TX
    Posts
    1,091
    Fantastic article! Thanks for sharing. I don't think we'll ever really know, but she SMOKED that field. Maybe she just had her "Michael Johnson" moment right then and there?

    Also, how does her 200m 21.34 compare? Isn't it about as far above the next best as her 100m is? To me that makes her 100m record much more reasonable and believable.


    In the first photo in that article, I noticed her "implausible deltoid" and I only phrase it that way because I remember that phrase in the SI "Busted" Ben Johnson issue when the author, speaking of a particular photo, mentioned that about Ben Johnson's right deltoid.
    Last edited by scottmitchell74; 08-28-2014 at 03:39 AM.
    You there on the bike, sell me one of you melons!
    Reply With Quote
     

  7. Collapse Details
     
    #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    2,481
    If there were indeed a crosswind, there would be visible signs of the runners fighting against that crosswind. I didn't see anything of the sort, even at the start. And if I'm not mistaken, don't the rules state that, if at any point during the course of the race, the wind changes direction in such a way that the tailwind measures more than 2.0, the race is invalidated for record purposes?

    Then there's the story of the wind gauge having not been properly warmed up before they started the quarterfinals.

    We need Shelly, maybe Tori, to go 10.60 (with a legal wind) to bring this debate back into the forefront, and perhaps force a review; in which case, Flo would get credit for 2 WRs (10.70 semi and 10.61 final) if they determine that her 10.49 quarterfinal was wind-aided.
    Last edited by CookyMonzta; 08-28-2014 at 08:11 AM.
    Reply With Quote
     

  8. Collapse Details
     
    #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Eugene, OR
    Posts
    466
    Ignore the flag, it's too inconclusive. Check the video, seconds 3-8. You can see the wind flapping the orange uniform of the gal next to Flo-Jo. This is a no-brainer.
    Reply With Quote
     

  9. Collapse Details
     
    #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    right here
    Posts
    9,466
    Quote Originally Posted by CookyMonzta View Post
    And if I'm not mistaken, don't the rules state that, if at any point during the course of the race, the wind changes direction in such a way that the tailwind measures more than 2.0, the race is invalidated for record purposes?
    There's nothing like that in the rules, it's the average wind speed during the race that matters.
    Było smaszno, a jaszmije smukwijne...
    Reply With Quote
     

  10. Collapse Details
     
    #10
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    firmly at Arya's side!
    Posts
    47,756
    and to put an even finer point on it, it's not the average "during the race"; can be for a period longer than the race or shorter.

    As in, for the 100, 10 seconds after the gun is fired. So in a Boltian race, the reading stops after the winner has crossed the line. For young kids, they might still be 20 meters from the finish when the reading ceased. (it's 13 seconds in the hurdles)
    Reply With Quote
     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •